cosmicben ([info]cosmicben) wrote,
@ 2008-03-14 12:48:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Funny Games
No matter which movie I’ve been to lately, I’ve been followed by the same creepy preview for Michael Haneke’s Funny Games.  A remake of an Austrian film he made ten years ago, it’s the story of two preppy teenagers who terrorize a wealthy family in their Long Island vacation home.

It looks sick, which is presumably the point.  The two squeaky-white lads invade the family’s home, cripple the father, and spend the rest of the night torturing the helpless victims (and presumably killing at least one of them).  The perpetrators are polite, well-dressed, and gleefully sadistic. 

The same goes for the movie itself, which seems to be a cut above the usual “masked guy slaughters horny teenagers” exploitation flick.  Haneke looks to be genuinely talented.  I have little doubt that he’s made a quality film.

The hot debate is whether Funny Games is torture porn along the lines of Saw and Hostel (which I haven’t seen) or, as the director says, an indictment of violence-loving American movie audiences.  Allegedly, he’s not glorifying or showcasing violence so much as making us feel bad for how much we love it.

That's for someone else to figure out, because I will never, ever watch this movie.  I hate films like this.  I hate being subjected to their previews, and I refuse to sit through them. 

This is not a high-minded protest.  I don’t care if Haneke wants me to salivate at torture, or whether he thinks I’m a Neanderthal for doing so.  There's nothing inherently wrong with what he's peddling, but I can't watch it.

I simply can’t stomach the creepy mood, the graphically drawn-out pain, or the “are they going to die?” suspense.  It is not my thing.  It is not worth two hours of my time.  I’m sure some great art is supposed to make me feel sick and uncomfortable, but I will happily miss out.

This isn't a screed against violence in movies.  I enjoy shoot-‘em-up violence, kung-fu violence, sports violence, military violence, realistic Godfather violence, and all-the-bad-guys-die Sly/Arnold violence.  Blood doesn’t faze me.  Explosions are awesome. 

Maybe these things desensitize us, but we should be intelligent enough to handle it.  We can stay civilized while paying lip service to our natural caveman impulses.   

One of my favorite films is Mel Gibson’s Apocalypto, which must have set the record for creatively gory on-screen deaths.  The helpless Mayans are stabbed, gutted, skewered, beheaded, bitten by rattlesnakes, and in a rare moment of mercy, simply pushed off a cliff.  

Gibson takes a certain undeniable glee in filming all of this, but the violence is not his point.  There is always humanity and uplift to balance the unrelenting death.  We wince when good Mayans die, and we feel a certain thrill when the bad guys go down, but there is always something bigger happening than the torture of innocents.

After seeing the Funny Games preview four times, I get a different sense from it.  The pain seems to be the point.  It might be highbrow, or lowbrow, or tacky, or brilliant.  But we are the ones being tortured, and I can't sit through it.

If you can, great.  There’s room for everything in film, and in life.  But I know the movie would reduce me to a curled-up ball of goo, and that’s not an experience I’ll voluntarily endure.




(4 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]disclaimerwill
2008-03-14 05:44 pm UTC (link)
I've put the Austrian version (which is apparently shot-for-shot identical to the English version) on my Netflix list out of curiosity, since I doubt the new film will come to Bangor. Have to save five out of our ten screens for Horton Hears a Who, doncha know.

It certainly sounds like a horribly unpleasant film, but I admit I'm curious about it. From the reviews I've read, most of the violence happens offscreen, which is what distinguishes it from Hostel or any of those, I assume. The pain is the point, as you said, but Haneke evidently doesn't even really give the audience the violence they crave, from a visual standpoint. To me, it sounds like the sort of satire (or "satire") that could easily contain one too many or too few layers of irony and completely obliterate its own point... but if the balance is correct, it could be one of those masterpieces that shatters you but that you can't stop thinking about ever, like Happiness. I think it'll be interesting to see which way it goes.

And now that we've reviewed it without seeing it, what do you think of that new Black Crowes album?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]cosmicben
2008-03-14 07:02 pm UTC (link)
It could be one of "those" movies. You know, "good". In my screed, I left open that possibility.

I'm basically a kid going on a lengthy rant about why broccoli sucks. I'm not denying that it might be good for you, but.......blech.

Cheers to that AV Club reference!
Jeers to this rusty broccoli!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]texanlimey
2008-03-14 06:07 pm UTC (link)
Good to see you updating! (Says the person who´s become the world´s worst lj updater...)

(Reply to this)


[info]dragonsnow
2008-03-14 08:14 pm UTC (link)
It's not for me to say whether or not torture porn is a good or a bad thing, and whether or not it encourages violence or is merely an outlet for a lot of anger and frustration I think many people in our culture feel about their lives and the world in general these days. Violence, in my opinion, has always been around, and if people like to watch it onscreen, then knock yourselves out. It's not my cup of tea at all, and I don't really understand why people like it, but I do understand that sometimes just watching that stuff is a sort of catharsis for wound-up, pent-up, pissed off people. And better that they take sick pleasure in the fake stuff than, you know...

I've seen the trailer for Funny Games, and I didn't immediately think it was a satire. After being just plain glad to see Tim Roth onscreen again, I was deeply disturbed by the implications of the trailer, especially where it is suggested that the mother gets raped in front of her husband and young son. The problem with "satires" such as this is that even if most or all of the violence is off-screen, it's still there, and to wag your finger at the audience while at the same time serving what they want to them on a platter strikes me as somewhat hypocritical.

I don't know. Maybe I'm just squeamish and need a high-minded justification for not being able to sit through these types of films, whether the violence is graphic or implied.

(Reply to this)


(4 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…